Graham Lister’s incessant invective against me here at MR requires some sort of resolution:

Posted by Graham_Lister on September 06, 2013, 02:00 PM | #

Authentic phenotypes that allow the “Holy Spirit” to be expressed.

Really?

Gee whiz that’s a new one for the biology textbooks.

Perhaps Mr. Bowery might write up a Princeton monograph on the subject?

And just where are we on the Bowery express from Crazyville to Loony Town?

Is it any wonder that even semi-serious people don’t seem to want to engage at MR?

Unbounded fuckwittery is not attractive, nor interesting, in anyway whatsoever.

These are not the words of a man with whom compromise is feasible.  There is no basis upon which we can “agree to disagree”.  He is persistent in accusing me of having an important, perhaps even dominant, deleterious effect on MR.  I could very well make the case that Lister’s persistent attacks are rendering the environment of MR repulsive to “semi-serious people”.  It certainly seems to be making MR repulsive to me and although Lister would certainly deny that I am, at best, “semi-serious”, my own perception is that I am indeed very serious and that I no longer wish to cast my pearls before such swine.

Therefore this will be my parting message to MR until such time as I have observed Lister to be absent for an extended period of time.

The Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research (PEAR) Lab may not produce a Princeton Monograph, but it has produced work that requires serious philosophical inquiry:

There are few people in the world who have sacrificed more in attempting to directly address the bankruptcy of scientific theory reflected in the frustration of the Princeton researchers in the above video.  My own work includes obtaining funds from HP to continue work done by Paul Allen’s erstwhile think tank “Interval Research”, to correct foundational mathematics of the empirical world pursued by Russell and Whitehead in Volume IV of Principia Mathematica.  That remedial work on Volume IV was directed toward a quantitative theory of relations that dealt with casting much of quantum mechanics and the science of so-called “paranormal” phenomena as a branch of mereology—Lister’s supposed, according to GW, primary area of potential contribution to “the ontology project”.

My contention here is that this area of inquiry has been relentlessly repressed from two opposing directions by Jewish movements, one in the religious realm in the form, primarily but not exclusively, of so-called “Christianity”, and the other direction from the Jewish-dominated “Skeptics” who are the shock troops of post-Manhattan Project big science and the academy.  These opposing movements work, in concert with the myth-making machine of Hollywood (aka “Dreamworks” as the founding Jews of that company call it) to mold collective consciousness in a way that alienates Euroman from his authentic self and does so not just with ‘mass psychology” but with the manipulation of “mass consciousness” and attendant paranormal “miracles”. 

This area of knowledge is a cornerstone of Jewish power throughout the ages and we can expect that the state of their knowledge is, at least as practical folklore, vastly superior to anything have been able to achieve in the area.  This explains the virtual panic migration of east European Jews from within a relatively small geographic area, across Europe, across the Atlantic and across North America to Hollywood where they established “An Empire of Their Own” very shortly after Edison’s invention became known.

We are dealing with armaments so advanced that they make our piddling efforts with “The Ontology Project” look like flint blades against a nuclear arsenal.  So long as that project is significantly affected by rascals such as Lister, it will remain in the stone age.

This interview was conducted midst an SPLC-triggered media frenzy. Immediately after completing this interview, the New York Times reporters showed up at the Leith, North Dakota residence of Craig Cobb—declared one of the most dangerous men in the US by the SPLC’s “Hate Watch”. Listen for the true story behind the frenzied article that will soon appear in the New York Times, and get an idea of Craig Cobb, the man—not the mythic monster.

UPDATE 5: CNN called Cobb asking him for a short statement of his motive for buying up lots in Leith, ND.  This statement was to appear on CNN in some form—Cobb mentioned their ticker.  He asked me for my suggestion and I came up with this:

It is supremacist for the government to test its social theories on unwilling human subjects.  I am trying to find a refuge for people who agree with my social theories.

When CNN called him back for his answer, he decided to go with my suggestion.  At this point CNN told Cobb that the message would appear at 7:15pm EDT.

The message did not appear on the news ticker at 7:15pm nor at any time during the next 20 minutes.

UPDATE 4: Click this link then click “Recommend” to promote the interview with NYT readership.

UPDATE 3: The New York Times story broke and the comments couldn’t stand in starker contrast to those made on the Drudge-linked story (see Update 2).  The comments to the Drudge-linked story are not only sympathetic to someone attempting to set up a protected area, but there is significant mention of hypocrisy.  There are two “publics” here one adhering to old media and the other to new media.  An additional note:  None of the North Dakota news sites carrying this story, and there are several, allow comments from the public.

UPDATE 2:  Drudge is running with the AP story.  If you want to have a high impact for almost no labor or time, just click this link and vote my comment up.

UPDATE:  The Associate Press story was just carried by ABC at their website.  My comment on the AP story there:

jabowery • a few seconds ago
This sentence in the article is false: “He declines to talk about his upbringing and gives no indication as to why he adopted his supremacist platform.”

Indeed I just posted a comment here that linked to an hour and a half interview that was mostly about his upbringing and development of his beliefs, and it was censored.

Do you people have no shame?

According to the SPLC‘s Mark Potok, “This is much further advanced than anything we’ve seen.”

What was he talking about?

READ MORE...

Out of the Christian frying pan into the Holocaustian fire.

Sam Swerling, former Chairman of the Monday Club and Conservative Party Councillor, on the doctrine of National Preference:

Markus Willinger of Generation Identitaire, providing a general introduction to this new movement:

Laslo Virag, of the Hungarian Traditionalist School, on the criteria of the right:

Ruben Rosiers, formerly of Vlaams Blok, on Syria and the turn of the tide for the New World Order.

BINews reports:

The president of Cyprus, Nicos Anastasiades, has announced the creation of a “Guaranteed Minimum Income” for all citizens. The president said, “Beneficiaries will be all of our fellow citizens who have an income below that which can assure them a dignified living, irrespective of age, class or professional situation.” According to Cyprus Mail, the policy will begin in June 2014. The exact level of the grant will be determined between now and then, but every citizen would be guaranteed “the minimum needs for a dignified living in a European Country.”

If the program goes into affect as described, it will be the world’s first full “Basic Income Guarantee” (BIG) as defined by the U.S. Basic income Guarantee Network: “government ensured guarantee that no one’s income will fall below the level necessary to meet their most basic needs for any reason.” However, the details of the program available so far indicate that it will be the negative income tax version (NIT) and not the basic income (BI) version of BIG. The difference is that NIT gets everyone to the minimum by paying only those whose incomes are below some minimum level, while BI gets everyone to the minimum, pay paying all citizens regardless of means. What will actually happen remains to be seen.

Cyprus is in a front-line battle for European territory, with many Turkish illegal immigrants who are not citizens but may be, nevertheless, cheap labor and political fodder.

This all gets back to a rather acrimonious history here at MR, regarding a Citizen’s Dividends To Capture Parliamentary Governments and most recently my open letter to Greek patriots in which I proposed that political economy for Greece’s current turmoil.

The reason Jews like Milton Friedman are attracted to means testing such as the Negative Income Tax requires, is it keeps private sector rent-seeking in place (by taxing economic activity rather than liquid value of assets) and public sector rent-seeking in place—albeit in an attenuated form.  Friedman was at least rational enough to understand that at some point, in order to maintain the private sector rent-seeking of the income tax against rising awareness that the most rational tax, and monetary, base is liquid value of net assets, a large portion of the public sector rent-seeking bureaucracy would have to be sacrificed so that some social goods could be delivered outside of “community organizers” who guide their voting blocs through the welfare bureaucracy’s labyrinthine rules to collect the public sector rents.  However, any means testing is the nose of the public sector rent-seeking camel sticking into the political economy’s tent.  It leaves the door open for political insiders play games which—almost inevitably—ends up favoring immigration liberalization driven by cheap labor interests among capitalistas, and constituency building among communistas.

So, we have the government of Cyprus resorting to Friedman’s stop-gap measure to preserve private sector rent-seeking virtually intact—by retaining taxes on economic activity as the source of public sector rents.  This may forestall a popular uprising that might immediately kick out all illegals and maybe even split the “republic” of Cyprus.  Indeed, such a popular uprising could end up killing off “leaders” in government, business and academia. so what they are doing is completely understandable.

However, even the Negative Income Tax does provide the Greek citizens of Cyprus with resources that may allow them to fight back politically, rather than merely laboring endlessly to pay the economic rents collected by capitalistas and communistas—both of which promote immigration.

Interesting times.

PS:  A “coincidence” is that in the aforelinked acrimonious debate about the citizens dividend, there is also an excerpt from an essay I wrote in 1982 while working on the first electronic newspaper in the US for the Knight Ridder News Service’s Miami Herald, that talks about the zero-sum mindset of the media authorities (which got me into a conflict with the Miami Herald’s editorial authorities).  The Washington Post is being purchased by Jeff Bezos.  1981-1983 I was the local support team leader in Miami for the Space Studies Institute sponsoring public awareness events about space settlement. Some punk gave his valedictorian speech on space settlement during Miami Palmetto Senior High School’s 1982 graduation ceremonies.  That punk’s name was Jeff Bezos.  Things are working out pretty much the way I foresaw in 1982.

I did not expect to find it necessary to discuss Hannah Arendt at this point. However, from even a cursory inspection of theoretical and historical issues relevant to White separatism and nationalism, one finds her person and views interjected to influence pivotal turns.

1. She was a student and intimate of Heidegger, highly familiar with his concerns as they would bear upon White nationalism and separatism.

2. She was a prominent and articulate Jewess, providing keen insight into the formulation of views in advocacy of those antagonistic to White nationalism and separatism.

For these two reasons, she is of high relevance theoretically.

3. She also managed to impose herself and her views concretely, at pivotal turns for White Nationalism: from her relationship with Heidegger and commentary on the Nazis to her other high profile commentary; on U.S. racial strife, particularly school desegregation, civil rights and her cause célèbre, anti-miscegenation laws – concrete issues which had the eyes of the world, including Marxist antagonists of American Whites, upon them.

Warning: this is a longish essay, 5,500 words. However, it is usefully read in 2 parts - the first part, dealing with theoretical background as it concerns White separatism, is about 2,600 words. The second part deals primarily with her application to issues of segregation as aroused by the Little Rock crisis; it contains some encouragement for the reader to contribute comments by way of their private taste and opinion: that is why I kept these parts together, because I would like the comments to be as one.

READ MORE...